24. PCR TESTS - FALSE POSITIVES OF 93-100%
'... used by the Government to fabricate the vast number of so-called ‘cases’ of Covid–19 on which the biosecurity state has been built with nothing more than traces of a dead virus.'
Boris Johnson admits only 7% of COVID tests are accurate
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bmQxWVlMJQes/
Sky News - Dominic Raab admits that Covid testing false positive rate is 93%
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aqPgQ6Q4vN4M/
3 min video with simple explanation of PCR tests and why so many false positives
DISARMING THE PCR TEST: THE UNFAIR ISOLATION OF HEALTHY PEOPLE (rumble.com)
2 min video on damning scientific review of Corman Drosten Paper (creators of PCR tests which introduced their use globally)
Covid19 PCR Test 97% false positive (rumble.com)
On 17 January 2020, as part of its recommended protocols for RT-PCR tests, the World Health Organization published the Corman-Drosten paper, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Among the numerous flaws in its catastrophically destructive protocols, the authors recommended using 45 cycles of thermal amplification of swab samples for SARS–CoV–2, which, as numerous studies have confirmed, is many times higher than the number of cycles (no more than 24) at which the specific coronavirus can be identified, infectious virus reliably detected, or its replication into a disease confirmed.
Despite this, these protocols were unquestioningly adopted and repeated across the world, including in the UK. On 16 March, the National Health Service, in its Guidance and standard operating procedure: Covid–19 virus testing in NHS laboratories, recommended a cycle threshold of 45, with anything below 40 to be regarded as a ‘confirmed’ positive. On 28 September, it was estimated that, at even 35 cycles of amplification, 97% of the positives in an RT-PCR test are false. Yet, as late as October 2020, in Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS–CoV–2 RT-PCR: A guide for health protection teams, Public Health England continued to advise those administering the tests in this country that ‘a typical RT-PCR assay will have a maximum of 40 thermal cycles’, while also conceding that such tests are ‘not able to distinguish whether infectious virus is present’.
Finally, there is the medically inaccurate equation—of a positive test for SARS–CoV–2 with a ‘case’ of Covid–19. This ignores what Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz and one of the most referenced scientists in German medical history, in an open letter to the German Chancellor published on 26 March 2020, described as the ‘traditional distinction’ in infectiology between infection with a virus and its replication into a disease identified by its clinical symptoms and not by a fatally flawed test. Despite this, this fundamentally flawed equation has been accepted without question, adopted without commentary and repeated without qualification by every medical body in the UK, and used by the Government to fabricate the vast number of so-called ‘cases’ of Covid–19 on which the biosecurity state has been built with nothing more than traces of a dead virus.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/whatever-happened-to-the-pandemic
Corman Drosten Independent Review Paper referred to above:
Excerpt from Conservative Woman - links below and more in the full article:
The turning point in exposing the test’s unreliability came on November 20, 2020. An appeals court in Portugal made the monumental ruling that ‘the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful’..... The OffGuardian article reporting it stated: ‘In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to three per cent, meaning up to 97 per cent of positive results could be false positives.’..... This groundbreaking ruling from a European appeals court should have been proof enough that the PCR test was far from being the ‘gold standard’ in testing for SARS-Cov-2 and essentially ‘not fit for purpose.’
(NB: The lower the test cycle, the more viral load can be found, the more viral load found, the higher the likelihood subject has COVID. However, some test cycles were 40 to 45 making 100% of PCR results false positives because what is found is only fractions of long dead virus and/or contamination.)
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-many-scandals-of-the-pcr-test-part-2/
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi – June 2021 The PCR was neither designed or approved for diagnosis of COVID. Totally inaccurate and certainly not appropriate. Kary Mullis (inventor) said, ‘Do not use this test for diagnosis’. ...should be trashed immediately, worldwide, and it should be considered a criminal act for anyone to be sent to quarantine because this test was positive. 2 min video
PCR testing fraud
During the COVID-19 pandemic, positive cases have driven everything: masks, social distancing, lockdowns, economic and food destruction, mental and physical health destruction, the arrested development of millions of children, a large number of preventable suicides, and a bevy of new, rushed, and barely tested vaccines.
Given that then, let us take an objective look at the main COVID-19 test, PCR, which determined whether a person was infected with SARS CoV-2 or not - all the while keeping in mind that positive case counts were the primary driver of the aforementioned restrictions.
Includes documents showing there were no isolated COVID-19 virus samples to work with, so used generic ones. Also in May 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control reduced the PCR test cycle count to 28 for VACCINATED individuals only to test for breakthrough cases (effect of this made it look as if ‘vaccine’ was working).